attended to discuss this issue. I was thinking that a section or all of the property (based on need) could be used for a community work and study home as explained in the Commentary on Welfare. Contrary to my thought of using the property to help the poverty stricken, most all of the people attending the meeting suggested that the property be used for leisure activities of town residents to include the establishment of a golf course. A few suggested that a portion of the property could be used for town offices. After listening to other’s ideas concerning the use of this property, I decided not to broach the subject of a community work and study home with this group of people, due to fears of attacks by evil. I dishearteningly left this meeting as no suggestions were made to address the concerns of the many needy people residing in the county and the astronomical costs to the taxpayers due to the lack of affordable housing and the lack of comprehensive career training for the poor.

One evening while attending a high school open house and meet the teachers’ night at daughter’s and son’s and my alma mater school, one noted several trailers used for classrooms placed on the lawn of the school. As the school enrollment was significantly less than when I attended this same school, one questioned the reason for these portable classrooms. The answer received informed one that a large section of the school containing many classrooms was no longer available for use by students and teachers because this area was now designated for storage.

This summer, I purchased a new automobile to reliably provide me with transportation to and from work as my older vehicle was increasingly experiencing mechanical troubles. Shortly after purchasing this vehicle that I was pleased with, a driver hit the rear of the car while I was stopped at a traffic light. Within a few weeks after this car was returned to me repaired from the automobile body shop, daughter asked me to drive home a friend of a friend. I asked daughter if there was someone at the friend of a friend’s home who could give this girl a ride back to her house. The reply was that no one could give her a lift home. Reluctantly, I agreed to transport this girl to her house. Without giving me prior advisement that I was nearing the home of the girl, I was told to make a left now as I was about to pass her house. Not seeing an approaching car due to the obtrusive lighting at dusk, my car was hit on the passenger side. Thankfully, no passengers inside the vehicle were seriously hurt. I noted that at least two adults were in the home of the friend of a friend’s house, with at least one car in the driveway, as I waited for forty minutes before the police arrived at the scene. The driver of the car that hit mine stated that he was driving a rental car as he was in an accident just a few days prior to this one. He could not believe these circumstances and stated that we should get together for dinner. I stated that I had just purchased this car and already was involved in two accidents after not having had an accident since I was sixteen years old. I interpreted these two accidents within this short period of time to be attacks by evil doers within the society.

Through limited internet access at work, I became aware of an internet business that offered investigative services to the general public at a nominal fee. These services were advertised to supply the patron with highly personal information on anyone desired of the patron’s request. I was greatly perturbed at this sanctioned invasion of an individual’s privacy. A few years later, I was disgusted to learn that satellite views of individual’s homes could be accessed on the internet. In both of the above