restrict and in some cases prohibit gun ownership based on some background checks of individuals applying to own this type of weapon. Various interest groups fought this legislation by citing the United States Constitution where it is stated that citizens have a right to bear arms. One thought that the right to life is also stated in the Constitution, but has been disregarded, ignored, and not enforced for at least fifty years leading one to believe that this important document is irrelevant in today’s evil society. It is important to note however, that both the right to life and the right to bear arms are ambiguous in the context that these “rights” were written in the United States Constitution. Note that the right to life shown in Amendment XIV, line 2 states that “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” The clause “without due process of law” could mean that if the law changes which it has, then others could have the right to murder other human beings in defiance of God’s Law that states Thou shall not kill. Regarding the “right” to bear arms, Article II (Amendment II) states “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The clause “A well-regulated militia” could result in the government completely regulating this “right to bear arms” by only permitting a few select people to own arms. The obvious solution to eliminate increasing violence and immorality in the society, is to restore the nation to a religious and moral foundation which is based on biblical morality that at its’ very core stresses the necessity that people abide by The Ten Commandments, avoid Capital Sins, and Abominations. Read the Commentaries shown at the end of this book for possible solutions to problems.
Throughout this year and the end of the prior year, a family member was given the use of spouses’ automobile. The family member continued to drive through highway tolls resulting in extraordinary fines levied and sent to spouse as owner of the vehicle. When questioning the family member on why the tolls were not being paid, the retort was that the family member “did not know”. One stated to spouse after receiving several of these bills not to allow the family member the use of his car any longer but for some reason spouse appeared to be compelled to continue to allow the family member use of his automobile. Believing this absurd situation to be further attacks by evil against our family, the following note with copies of the many numerous toll violations were sent in November to two highway commissioners and the United States Transportation secretary.
Enclosed is a package of toll violations totaling $1893.70 for actual tolls totaling $43.40, that (Spouse) and Barbara Nikonoff residing at (our home address was written), have paid since September of 2011 to the present date.
A family member was given use of our automobile and had the funds to pay for these tolls but for reasons unknown to us did not pay these tolls leaving Barbara and (Spouse) Nikonoff responsible for these payments.
I have several questions as follows to ask and would appreciate a written response to these by the New Jersey Department of Transportation.